Posted On: July 24, 2009

Hot Dogs Not Good for You? Probably Not New News for Most Health Conscious San Franciscans

Hot dogs are as dangerous and cancerous as cigarettes? They are-- or at least they should be labeled as such-- according to a consumer fraud lawsuit filed on behalf of three New Jersey residents against Nathan’s Famous, Kraft Foods/Oscar Mayer, Sara Lee, Con Agra Foods, and Marathon Enterprises. The law suit was filed by the nonprofit Cancer Project, a collaborative effort of physicians, researchers and nutritionists who have joined together to educate the public about the benefits of a healthy diet for cancer prevention and survival and is also an affiliate of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM). All five companies are being accused of failure to warn customers that consumption of hotdogs increases the danger of colorectal cancer and seeks to compel all five companies to place cancer-risk warning labels on hot dog packages sold in New Jersey. According to PCRM, the lawsuit is based on the findings of a landmark report from the American Institute for Cancer Research, based on 58 separate scientific studies, showing that just one 50-gram serving of processed meat (about the amount in one hot dog) consumed daily increases the risk of colorectal cancer, on average, by 21 percent. Risk increases with increasing consumption. Colorectal cancer is a common and serious condition. According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer in both men and women.

To some this lawsuit may seem absurd, but, here at the Brod Law Firm, we feel that that may just be the point. We might just need to be shook, shocked, or knocked in the head with such news and information, information that makes us stop for a moment, engage our imaginations, and think about our relationship to food in this country. We do not protest the consumption of hot dogs—everything in moderation, that is our motto. But this type of news just might force some of us, some for the very first time, to see foods previously viewed as an “acceptable”, as unacceptable for the health of our bodies. Most people don’t realize, or do realize but choose to deny, when they purchase a package of hot dogs that they are made from carcass remnants and chemical additives. Additionally, they may not be aware that the nitrates, used as a preservative in hot dogs, break down into nitrosamines and other cancer forming compounds that are considered carcinogens. The more consumers purchase hot dogs and consume these compounds, the more they are at risk. As Neal D. Barnard of PCRM states: “The problem now is simply cultural. As slow as people were to accept that the cool-looking cigarette in Bogart’s lips might have been linked to the cancer that killed him, we have been even slower to accept that the foods we have given our children might lead to cancer in adulthood.”

Posted On: July 17, 2009

A New Personal Injury Risk is on the Rise in California

The NHTSA recently released the findings of a roadside survey to test blood alcohol and drug levels. The survey data were collected in 2007 from roadside locations throughout the country. Drivers were selected at random and waved off the road to a survey location by police officers, but the drivers were approached by interviewers who were not police officers. The drivers were assured that the survey was voluntary and anonymous. Of the 11,000 randomly selected drivers, about 90 percent agreed to give breath samples and 70 percent agreed to give saliva samples. Data collectors and a phlebotomist (an individual trained to draw blood) conducted surveys between 10pm and midnight and between 1am and 3am on both Friday and Saturday nights, for one weekend in six selected States. The interviewers used extra incentives to encourage participation in the survey. For example, drivers were given $10 for saliva samples and $50 for blood samples. When a driver refused to take part in any of the testing, they were then offered $100.

The study found that the number of drivers found to be driving under the influence of alcohol appears to be declining, while many weekend drivers test positive for drug use. The roadside survey also used screening methods to detect marijuana, cocaine and prescription drugs. The drug tests only indicated the presence of a drug in the body and didn’t indicate when the drugs were used or whether the driver was impaired. Here at the Brod Law Firm we are pleased to hear that the rate of alcohol impaired driving is down but discouraged learn that drug impaired driving is on the rise. This study sheds light on troubling issue in this country, an issue that needs to be addressed by society as a whole: prescription drug abuse. Research shows that prescription drug abuse is high mostly among young adults. This is a huge public health risk, considering young, first time, inexperienced drivers are getting high and then getting behind the wheel of a car. Just as aggressive public awareness campaigns have been built around the dangers of drunk driving, new campaigns, made up of health care workers, parents, and schools, should be built around this growing danger within our communities.

Posted On: July 1, 2009

San Francisco Injury Lawyer Urges the Public to Play it Safe This Fourth of July

Every Fourth of July, people are needlessly injured to accidents involving Fireworks. Some of the injuries that occur are due to fireworks were improperly manufactured. In such cases the manufacturer, the distributer and the vendor of the fireworks each could be liable. According a report put out U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) in 2006, among different types of fireworks, firecrackers were associated with the greatest number estimated injures. Following firecrackers, rockets and sparklers were next. Sparklers accounted for one-third of all injuries to children under 5. Approximately half the estimated sparkler injuries involved the hands and fingers. The data also shows that typical causes of injuries were the following: 1.) misuse of fireworks, 2.) fireworks exploding earlier or later than expected, 3.) errant flight paths, 4.) sparks or debris from fireworks igniting fires 5.) other malfunctions. Another highlight from the report states that the parts of the body most often injured were hands, eyes and the head, face and ear. More than half of the injuries were burns. Burns were the most common injury to all parts of the body except the eyes and head areas, where contusions, lacerations, and foreign bodies in the eye occurred more frequently. There were 11 deaths and 9,000 injuries reported that year.

Here at the Brod Law Firm we have simple advice for staying safe this 4th of July holiday: if you want to see fireworks explode, leave that to the professionals. If you simply must buy and use your own, check with local authorities to see which are legal to use. Also be sure to check if any are on a recall list put out by www.recalls.gov. Most importantly, use extreme caution when using any form of explosive device. Protect your hands, eyes and head and keep children at safe distance from any fireworks or sparklers. Don’t have your Fourth of July holiday turn into a tragedy.