Articles Posted in Toxic Torts

Lead paint has been recognized as a dangerous substance that can cause serious injury by the public for some time now. While many modern day lead paint stories come from events like dangerous toy recalls, ten California public agencies, including the city of San Francisco, are making headlines this week in their ongoing battle against major lead paint manufacturers. While lead paint suits may have at one time thought to have been the wave in toxic tort litigation, the recent suits seems to suggest otherwise.

Legalnewsline.com reports that the suit, The People of California v. Atlantic Richfield Company, et. al., is making headlines this week as expert witness testimony is being heard in Santa Clara County Superior Court. Though the suit was filed 13 years ago, the battle is fresh, and, despite urgings from the judge, no settlement appears to be on the horizon. So far, Dr. Gerald Markowitz, an expert historian and professor from the City University of New York, has testified that deregulation in laws permitted paint companies such as Atlantic Richfield Company (also known as “ARCO”) to mix lead paint for tens of years, even though they were aware that there were health hazards associated with it.

Despite this testimony, and other equally as strong evidence, success against the major lead manufacturers is far from a slam dunk. According to Publicintergrity.org, the lead paint industry has successfully defended against approximately 50 suits by various plaintiffs, including states, counties, school districts and states over the last two-and-a-half decades.

One of the hallmarks of our times is a commitment to and concern about the safety of both indoor and outdoor environments. We worry about car exhaust causing respiratory illness and the danger of BPA leaching into our drinking water. One threat that many think is largely in the past is lead contamination. However, our Oakland lead contamination lawyer knows that lead poisoning remains a public health issue and that people are still falling ill due to lead paint in older California homes.

paintcans.jpg An Overview of the Lead Paint Lawsuit

This week, the Oakland Tribune released a report examining a lawsuit brought by ten California cities (including San Francisco county and the city of Oakland) against paint manufacturers (including Sherwin-Williams and Atlantic Richfield). It is a fight that dates back 13 years, a billion-dollar battle about the role of the paint industry in covering the state’s residential landscape with lead paint.

It has been a week filled with difficult news. Our hearts go out to those injured in the Boston Marathon bombing and to the families of those killed in the attack. A day later, on Tuesday, a frightening story of envelopes potentially containing a dangerous poison followed. The week was already bad enough when, on Wednesday evening, an explosion rocked a Texas town. Our San Francisco industrial accident law firm is closely following this developing story, a case involving a workplace explosion and the added risk of toxic exposure.

Explosion Levels Town, Claims Lives, and Raises Concerns of Toxic Exposure

At the time of this writing, the story was still unfolding and The San Francisco Chronicle reported that the explosion at a fertilizer plant in Texas had claimed between five and fifteen lives. The incident occurred in the town of West, a community of 2,800 about twenty miles north of Waco. Reports indicate that an initial fire at the West Fertilizer Company broke out around 7:30 P.M. and was followed about 50 minutes later by a large explosion registering a 2.5 on the Richter scale. The blast leveled a five-block area and left a scene that Sergeant William Patrick Swanton of the Waco police department called “almost tornadic” in appearance. Other witnesses say it looked like a war zone. More than 150 people were taken to hospitals in the area, including at least 24 in critical condition and 38 more in serious condition at the time of the article. Injuries included broken bones, major lacerations, and burns. Emergency personnel who responded to the initial fire are believed to be among the victims and three to five firefighters were unaccounted for as of a briefing on Thursday morning.

Nearly three years have passed since the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster, but the oil spill still looms large for the people and businesses impacted by its massive scope. As your San Francisco/Oakland oil spill law firm, we are closely following the on-going legal disputes stemming from the accident. Monitoring the Gulf Coast oil spill case and resulting precedents will allow our legal team to provide top-notch representation to those impacted by Pacific Coast oil spills and other environmental incidents in the Northern California region.

oilspill.jpgCivil Case Follows Criminal Plea

This week, as reported by the Associated Press and Oakland Tribune, Judge Carl Barbier opened the civil trial in which the U.S. Justice Department and representatives of businesses and individuals impacted by the Deepwater Horizon are seeking monetary damages from BP and other partners in the drilling project. Previously, BP pled guilty to manslaughter and other criminal charges. Those charges led to $4 billion in penalties, just one portion of the $24 billion that BP has spent on spill-related expenses to date. In the current civil case, federal authorities, impacted states, and affected businesses and individuals are looking to hold BP and its partners liable for civil damages under the Clean Water Act and other environmental laws. The trial, which could lead to a verdict in the tens of billions, began after repeated settlement talks failed to produce an agreement.

Our San Francisco toxic tort law firm represents people who suffer serious illness as a result of exposure to chemicals or other toxins. Toxic tort cases are often complicated by the fact that many illnesses do not develop until several years after exposure. We follow exposure-related sicknesses from across the country, and even across the globe, so that we can help our California clients develop evidence to support their legal claims in our state and federal courts.

poison.pngResearchers Find Increased Rate of Certain Cancers in World Trade Center Firefighters

A newly released study, discussed in an article in U.S. News & World Report, suggests an increased rate of several cancers among the first responder to the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Researchers at the New York City Department of Health found a forty percent increase in the rate of prostate cancer among the 9,853 firefighters working for the New York Fire Department. The group also suffered from thyroid cancers twice as frequently as occurred in the general population. Additionally, seven of the firefighters developed multiple myeloma, as opposed to the two cases that would be expected in a group of that size.

Representing clients injured in San Francisco workplace disasters means following news from across the nation and even around the globe. Although New Zealand is on the other side of the world, the investigation into a mine explosion that occurred there two years ago can hold lessons for the coal mining industry and related fields here in Northern California. These lessons can also translate into legal responsibility, opening companies that ignore safety up to lawsuits from those injured by industrial negligence.

Report Finds Company & Regulatory Fault in New Zealand Mine Explosion that Killed Twenty-Nine

flame.jpgThe San Francisco Chronicle is following the release of an investigation into a tragic underground explosion in a New Zealand mine that killed twenty-nine workers in November 2010. After eleven weeks of hearings, the report concluded that the Pike River Coal company exposed miners to an unacceptable level of risk as it focused instead on financial gains. The cited failures include ignoring twenty-one specific warnings in the seven weeks prior to the explosion that methane gas had grown to explosive levels below ground, plus twenty-seven other warnings of danger, with warnings continuing through the morning of the explosion. In some instances, workers rigged their machines to bypass methane sensors to prevent a safety trigger that would automatically shut the equipment down when methane levels grew too high.

Staying informed about national issues helps ensure that The Brod Law Firm team provides top-quality services as your San Francisco law firm. One of our focal areas is protecting Northern Californians harmed by Pacific Coast oil spills or by other oil and gas industry accidents. We represent individuals and also serve as plaintiffs’ class action counsel in a range of industry and toxic tort matters in the Northern California region. As such, we have an interest in the developments of other claims involving other localities.

oilrig.pngThe RESTORE Act vs. New DOJ Proposals

A recent dispute, highlighted in the Chicago Tribune, has been brewing over the funds intended to provide reparations in the wake of the Gulf Oil Spill. On July 6, 2012, President Obama signed the RESTORE Act into law directing that a minimum of eighty percent of the penalties paid pursuant to BP’s proven violations of the Clean Water Act will be earmarked and used in a trust fund to restore the five coastal states damaged by the Deepwater Horizons . The included states are Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Florida, and Texas. The Clean Water Act funds, as proposed in the initial RESTORE Act, would go to the U.S. Treasury. Per the Act’s provisions, anywhere from $4 billion to $16.8 billion dollars would then pass on to the Gulf Coast States.

Sometimes health threats seem so widely known that we assume they should no longer be an on-going problem. According to the Center for Disease Control (the “CDC”), children in at least four million households worldwide continue to be exposed to lead, despite the fact that the dangers of exposure have long been known. In just the U.S. alone, approximately half a million children under age five have dangerous levels of lead in their blood (above five micrograms per deciliter). Our San Francisco lead poisoning lawyer remains committed to helping individuals and families whose health has suffered as a result of exposure to lead and other dangerous toxins.

posion.pngWhile lead poisoning can impact nearly every system in the human body, it often has few or no obvious early symptoms. High levels of lead can damage kidneys, cause high blood pressure and other forms of heart disease, cause gastrointestinal and neuromuscular problems, and impact both male and female reproductive systems. Lead can pass from a mother to a baby while in utero, leading to a risk of miscarriage, premature birth, and developmental problems in childhood. Lead is particularly dangerous to the nervous system and while damage to some systems may be reversible if treated, damage to the central nervous system cannot be reversed. Children’s nervous systems are especially at risk with lead exposure causing decreased brain volume and other neural damage that may lead to learning and developmental disabilities. Memory, reasoning skills, reading ability, attention span, and social skills can be harmed at very low blood levels, particularly in the fast-developing brains of younger children. Lead exposure can also shorten life span and lead to increased death rates from a number of related causes.

The CDC has created a Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program aimed at eliminating blood levels in excess of 10 micrograms per deciliter by 2020. Program officials note that lead is often a bigger threat to people in poorer areas, although it has been reported in a range of social classes. While the U.S. banned the use of lead-based paint for housing purposes in 1978, it remains present in many older homes. Certain workplaces can contain high-levels of lead, such as place that manufacture radiation shields and ammunition as well as some industrial plants. Parents may be exposed to lead at work and carry dust home leading to their children being exposed to the toxin. Lead has also been found in toys, particularly those imported from nations with less regulation.

At The Brod Law Firm, we continue to field calls related to the August 6 fire at the Chevron refinery. Our team is ready and able to help those who have suffered ill health as a result of chemical exposure in Richmond and the surrounding areas.

Industry Oversight

As noted by The San Francisco Chronicle, there is ongoing debate about regulating the refinery industry. While petroleum business groups suggest they operate in one of the nation’s most regulated fields, others say the oversight regime is filled with gaps and relies too heavily on self-regulation. Critics note that the American Petroleum Institute is both a lobbying organization and the main source and publisher for refinery standards and guidelines. Safety groups add that the group has blocked efforts to require reporting of safety failures.

At The Brod Law Firm, we continue to speak with victims of the Richmond refinery fire on August 6, 2012. We are able to help those who have already contacted Chevron only to find they were offered a grossly inadequate amount of compensation as well as those who have not yet sought damages. If the fire caused you or your family health problems, you have a right to be compensated. We can fight for those present at the plant itself as well as those in the surrounding region who fell ill after the cloud of hazardous chemicals enveloped the neighboring communities.

danger.pngHistory shows us that it is a matter of when the next toxic chemical exposure occurs, not a matter of “if” it will. The Chevron plant has seen several disasters in recent years. It is, of course, not the only potential source of toxic chemical exposure in the Northern California region. Asserting your right to compensation, no matter how apologetic a company may appear in the wake of an accident, is an important part of reminding companies that they are accountable for their actions and need to prioritize safety over profits. Bringing a claim is one way to help prevent companies from side-stepping public safety.

It is also important that people be prepared to react when a toxic chemical leak or similar disaster occurs. One alert you may hear in the immediate wake of an incident is a “shelter in place” alert. This can impact a single building, such as an industrial workplace, or an entire community. According to the American Red Cross, this order can follow either an accidental or intentional release of chemical, biological, or radioactive contaminants. The order seeks to keep the public safe while remaining indoors. Upon hearing the recommendation, you should look for a small, interior room, preferably with no windows. You do not need to fully seal off your home, but you should close windows and doors and shut off airflow systems. In case of a chemical concern, an above-ground room is preferable since some chemicals are heavier than air and could potentially seep into a basement location.

Contact Information